Open Access Peer Reviewed COPE Aligned DOI Registered Version of Record

Official Article Landing Page

The Role of Courts as Administrators in PIL and Its Social Dimensions

International Journal of Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences and Commerce International Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Refereed Journal

Google Scholar indexing depends on Google Scholar’s crawl schedule. Verify DOI opens the external DOI resolver.

Abstract

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has emerged as one of the most significant developments in the Indian judicial system. It has enabled the courts to protect the rights of poor, disadvantaged and marginalized sections of society who are often unable to approach the courts themselves. The growth of PIL is closely associated with judicial activism, particularly the liberal interpretation of Fundamental Rights under the Constitution. Through PIL, the Supreme Court and High Courts have intervened in matters concerning bonded labour, prisoners, environmental protection, minimum wages, public health, women, children and the right to live with dignity. In several cases, the judiciary has issued directions that appear to enter the administrative or policy-making domain. This has generated an important constitutional debate concerning separation of powers and judicial overreach. This paper examines the development of PIL in India, its social dimensions, the judicial assumption of administrative functions, its contribution to distributive justice, and the need for judicial self-restraint.

Official DOI Landing Verification

This is the official published Version of Record. DOI status: Registered.

DOI StatusRegistered
PDF StatusAvailable
LicenseCC BY 4.0
MetadataMachine-readable
VersionVersion of Record
Article IntegrityVerified
DOI Record StatusRegistered
Google Scholar StatusMetadata Ready
Peer ReviewCompleted

Article Metadata

Article IDIJAHSSC-V2I1-062
Article TypeResearch Article
Volume2
Issue1
Pages12-16
Published06 June 2026
LanguageEnglish
ISSN3139-0749
DOI Prefix10.65919
PublisherUnivColl Publications
Access ModelOpen Access
Peer ReviewDouble-Blind
LicenseCC BY 4.0
Article DOI10.65919/ijahssc.2026.v2i1003

Authors & Affiliations

* Corresponding Author. Author contact details are available in the published PDF article as per journal policy.

Received 05 November 2025
Accepted 16 December 2025
Published 06 June 2026

Keywords & Indexing Terms

Download Center

Indexing & Verification

Article Metrics

Article Views7
PDF Downloads1
Total Pages5

Metrics are indicative and may update periodically after indexing, downloads and citation tracking are enabled.

Article Integrity & Transparency

Peer ReviewDouble Blind
Plagiarism CheckCompleted
COPE ComplianceFollowed
Correction StatusNo correction issued
Retraction StatusNot retracted
VersionVersion of Record

License & Copyright

CC BY 4.0

© 2026 The Author(s). The author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .

How to Cite

Kishor, K. (2026). The Role of Courts as Administrators in PIL and Its Social Dimensions. International Journal of Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences and Commerce, 2(1), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.65919/ijahssc.2026.v2i1003

PDF Preview

If the PDF preview does not load on your device, open the PDF directly or use the Download PDF button. Open PDF in new tab

Declarations

Funding

No external funding information has been declared unless stated in the published PDF.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest unless otherwise stated in the article.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval status is as per the article and journal policy.

Data Availability

Data availability is as declared by the author(s) in the published article.

Author Contributions

Author contributions are recorded as per submitted manuscript and editorial records.

AI-use Declaration

AI-use declaration is governed by journal policy and author disclosure.

Publisher's Note

  • ✓ The views, opinions and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the author(s).
  • ✓ Publication of this article does not imply endorsement by IJAHSSC, the editorial board or the publisher.
  • ✓ Responsibility for the accuracy, originality and integrity of the work remains with the author(s).
  • ✓ Readers are encouraged to independently evaluate and verify the information before application or citation.
  • ✓ IJAHSSC and UnivColl Publications shall not be held liable for any consequences arising from the use of the published content.

References

Showing first 3 references. Click “Show All References” to view complete list.

  1. 1. Constitution of India, particularly Articles 14, 21, 23, 32, 46 and 226.
  2. 2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597.
  3. 3. Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
  4. 4. Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976.
  5. 5. Kerala Marine Fishing Regulation Act, 1980.
  6. 6. Montesquieu, The Spirit of Laws.
  7. 7. Lord Denning, The Discipline of Law.
  8. 8. Indian Bar Review, discussions on Public Interest Litigation and Judicial Activism.
  9. 9. Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976
  10. 10. Joyachan Antony v. State of Kerala AIR1994 SC 721
  11. 11. Umed Rams Case AIR 1986 SC 847
  12. 12. Brown v. Board of Education 1984 Law ed 873

Related Articles

Publish Your Research With IJAHSSC

Submit your original research article, review paper, case study or conceptual paper to an international open access, peer-reviewed and refereed journal.

Article Transparency Report

This transparency report provides information regarding peer review, editorial evaluation, publication ethics, metadata verification, DOI registration, article integrity, licensing and scholarly publishing standards followed by IJAHSSC.

Conflict of InterestAs Declared by Author(s)
Funding SourceAs Declared in Article
AI Usage DeclarationAs Per Journal Policy
Ethical ComplianceVerified
Peer Review ModelDouble-Blind Peer Review
Editorial ScreeningCompleted
Plagiarism ScreeningCompleted
Research Integrity CheckVerified
DOI StatusRegistered
Metadata QualityMachine-Readable Metadata
Google Scholar CompatibilityMetadata Compatible
Schema.org MetadataImplemented
Dublin Core MetadataImplemented
Version StatusVersion of Record
Correction StatusNo Correction Issued
Retraction StatusNot Retracted
Access ModelOpen Access
LicenseCC BY 4.0
Publication EthicsCOPE Aligned
Chat with Editor